4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
16
18
4
5
6
1
Melhor posição
#3
#1
#2
#1
#3
#1
Posição média
5.5
6.1
3.3
2.8
4.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2024
2026
2026
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
47
40
139
146
66

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação