4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
16
3
4
3
1
Melhor posição
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Posição média
5.5
3.7
3.3
1.3
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2025
2026
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
36
40
23
66

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store