4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
16
3
28
1
4
Melhor posição
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
Posição média
5.5
3.7
2.3
1.0
3.3
Teste mais recente
2023
2025
2026
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
36
67
66
40

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação