4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
16
28
4
6
3
Melhor posição
#3
#1
#3
#3
#2
Posição média
5.5
2.3
12.0
4.7
3.7
Teste mais recente
2023
2026
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
68
111
146
36

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store