4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
18
4
5
4
1
3
Melhor posição
#1
#3
#1
#2
#1
#2
Posição média
6.1
12.0
2.8
3.3
1.0
3.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
111
139
40
66
36

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação