4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
18
2
3
1
4
Melhor posição
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
Posição média
6.1
1.5
3.7
1.0
3.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2024
2025
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
54
36
66
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store