4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Número de testes
18
10
4
3
28
Melhor posição
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
Posição média
6.1
6.0
12.0
3.7
2.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2025
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
109
111
36
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store