4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
18
10
3
3
4
Melhor posição
#1
#2
#2
#1
#2
Posição média
6.1
6.0
3.7
1.3
3.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2025
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
109
36
23
40

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store