4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Número de testes
18
4
4
3
23
Melhor posição
#1
#2
#3
#4
#1
Posição média
6.1
3.3
12.0
4.3
3.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
40
111
99
176

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação