4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Número de testes
18
4
4
3
3
5
Melhor posição
#1
#2
#3
#4
#2
#1
Posição média
6.1
3.3
12.0
4.3
3.7
2.2
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
40
111
99
36
63

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação