4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
18
21
4
3
1
1
Melhor posição
#1
#2
#2
#2
#1
#1
Posição média
6.1
11.9
3.3
3.7
1.0
1.0
Teste mais recente
2024
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
165
40
36
66
66

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store