4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Número de testes
18
6
1
4
24
Melhor posição
#1
#3
#1
#2
#1
Posição média
6.1
4.7
1.0
3.3
2.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
146
66
40
151

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store