4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Número de testes
18
3
10
4
3
Melhor posição
#1
#2
#2
#2
#1
Posição média
6.1
3.7
6.0
3.3
1.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2026
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
36
109
40
23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store