4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Número de testes
18
3
4
1
24
Melhor posição
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Posição média
6.1
3.7
3.3
1.0
2.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
36
40
66
151

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store