4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Nokian WetProof vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Firestone
Roadhawk
Nokian
WetProof
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
21
14
4
3
1
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Posição média
11.9
5.6
3.3
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2024
2023
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
165
47
40
36
66

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Nokian WetProof
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Nokian WetProof
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Nokian WetProof
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Nokian WetProof
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Nokian WetProof
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Nokian WetProof
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Nokian WetProof
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Seco
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Nokian WetProof
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Nokian WetProof
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Nokian WetProof
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Comportamento em condução seca
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Nokian WetProof
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Resposta da direcção seca
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Nokian WetProof
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Nokian WetProof
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Nokian WetProof
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Nokian WetProof
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Ruído interior
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Nokian WetProof
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Custos
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Nokian WetProof
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Nokian WetProof
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Nokian WetProof
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Nokian WetProof
46%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store