4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Firestone
Roadhawk
Nokian
WetProof
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
21
14
3
4
1
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Posição média
11.9
5.6
3.7
3.3
1.0
Teste mais recente
2024
2023
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
165
47
36
40
66

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Nokian WetProof
89%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Seco
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Nokian WetProof
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Comportamento em condução seca
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Nokian WetProof
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Resposta da direcção seca
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Nokian WetProof
63%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Ruído interior
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Nokian WetProof
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Custos
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Nokian WetProof
61%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Nokian WetProof
46%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store