4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
21
10
4
14
4
Melhor posição
#2
#2
#2
#1
#2
Posição média
11.9
6.0
3.3
3.6
3.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
165
109
40
194
40

Molhado

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Guia lateral húmida
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Desempenho em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Seco

Seco
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Comportamento em condução seca
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Desempenho em piso seco
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Resposta da direcção seca
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%

Conforto

Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Ruído interior
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Custos

Custos
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Eficiência de combustível
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação