4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
21
18
17
3
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#1
#2
Posição média
11.9
6.1
1.7
3.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
165
47
80
36

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Guia lateral húmida
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Seco
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Comportamento em condução seca
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Resposta da direcção seca
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Conforto
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído interior
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Custos
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store