4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Perfil do teste

Firestone
Roadhawk
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Número de testes
21
3
13
4
28
Melhor posição
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Posição média
11.9
3.7
4.3
3.3
2.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2025
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
165
36
123
40
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Guia lateral húmida
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Seco
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Resposta da direcção seca
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Ruído interior
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Custos
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store