4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
21
14
4
5
3
Melhor posição
#2
#8
#2
#1
#2
Posição média
11.9
13.4
3.3
2.8
3.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2026
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
165
153
40
139
36

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Guia lateral húmida
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Seco
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Comportamento em condução seca
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído interior
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Custos
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store