4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
6
18
23
14
1
Melhor posição
#3
#1
#1
#1
#1
Posição média
4.7
6.1
3.3
3.6
1.0
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
146
47
176
194
66

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seco
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Desempenho em piso seco
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Mudança de faixa seca
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Custos
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store