4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Perfil do teste

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Número de testes
14
16
10
18
5
Melhor posição
#8
#3
#2
#1
#1
Posição média
13.4
5.5
6.0
6.1
4.8
Teste mais recente
2026
2023
2026
2024
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
153
109
47
158

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Frenagem úmida
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Curva em círculo molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Travagem a seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Manuseamento a seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Conforto
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Ruído exterior
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Conforto
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Ruído interior
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%
Custos
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Resistência ao rolamento
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Quilometragem
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Preço/valor
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store