4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
14
21
4
5
3
Melhor posição
#8
#2
#2
#1
#2
Posição média
13.4
11.9
3.3
2.8
3.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2026
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
165
40
139
36

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Frenagem úmida
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Guia lateral húmida
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Comportamento em condução seca
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Conforto
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído interior
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Custos
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preço/valor
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store