4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
14
21
6
4
1
Melhor posição
#8
#2
#3
#2
#1
Posição média
13.4
11.9
4.7
3.3
1.0
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2026
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
165
146
40
66

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Frenagem úmida
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Curva em círculo molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Desempenho em piso molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Desempenho em piso seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Comportamento em condução seca
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Conforto
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Ruído interior
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Custos
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preço/valor
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store