4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Radar Dimax Winter vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Perfil do teste

Radar
Dimax Winter
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Número de testes
1
4
1
18
10
Melhor posição
#21
#2
#1
#1
#2
Posição média
21.0
3.3
1.0
6.1
6.0
Teste mais recente
2025
2026
2025
2024
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
37
40
27
47
109

Molhado

Molhado
Radar Dimax Winter
40%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Frenagem úmida
Radar Dimax Winter
49%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Radar Dimax Winter
11%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%

Neve

Neve
Radar Dimax Winter
43%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Gelo

Gelo
Radar Dimax Winter
23%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação