4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Nokian WetProof vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Perfil do teste

Nokian
WetProof
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Número de testes
14
14
4
28
Melhor posição
#1
#8
#2
#1
Posição média
5.6
13.4
3.3
2.3
Teste mais recente
2023
2026
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
153
40
68

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Nokian WetProof
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian WetProof
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian WetProof
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian WetProof
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian WetProof
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian WetProof
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Guia lateral húmida
Nokian WetProof
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Desempenho em piso molhado
Nokian WetProof
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Seco
Nokian WetProof
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Travagem a seco
Nokian WetProof
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian WetProof
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Mudança de faixa seca
Nokian WetProof
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Comportamento em condução seca
Nokian WetProof
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Resposta da direcção seca
Nokian WetProof
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Desempenho em piso seco
Nokian WetProof
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Conforto
Nokian WetProof
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Ruído exterior
Nokian WetProof
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Ruído interior
Nokian WetProof
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Conforto
Nokian WetProof
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Custos
Nokian WetProof
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian WetProof
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Quilometragem
Nokian WetProof
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preço/valor
Nokian WetProof
46%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store