Comparação: Nokian Powerproof vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Médio-alto

Nokian

Powerproof

R17 – R20

VS

Prémio

Bridgestone

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Powerproof

Potenza S001

PremiumContact 6

Ecsta PS71

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Número de testes

11

5

36

15

Best position

#2

#3

#1

#2

#1

Average position

7.5

7.0

3.1

9.0

2.3

Teste mais recente

2022

2020

2023

2025

2022

Tamanhos disponíveis

53

185

296

225

187

Comparação de desempenho

Média de 2 testes

Desempenho em molhado

78%

Nokian

Powerproof

66%

Bridgestone

Potenza S001

84%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

77%

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

76%

GoodYear

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Frenagem úmida

Nokian Powerproof

92%

Bridgestone Potenza S001

64%

Continental PremiumContact 6

89%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

84%

GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

79%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Nokian Powerproof

79%

Bridgestone Potenza S001

46%

Continental PremiumContact 6

94%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

70%

GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

88%

Curva em círculo molhado

Nokian Powerproof

80%

Bridgestone Potenza S001

58%

Continental PremiumContact 6

91%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

58%

GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

69%

Aquaplanagem longitudinal

Nokian Powerproof

66%

Bridgestone Potenza S001

78%

Continental PremiumContact 6

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

89%

GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

66%

Aquaplanagem transversal

Nokian Powerproof

72%

Bridgestone Potenza S001

83%

Continental PremiumContact 6

76%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

83%

GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

76%

Desempenho em piso seco

84%

Nokian

Powerproof

92%

Bridgestone

Potenza S001

94%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

92%

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

85%

GoodYear

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Travagem a seco

Nokian Powerproof

88%

Bridgestone Potenza S001

92%

Continental PremiumContact 6

91%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

92%

GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

91%

Manuseamento a seco

Nokian Powerproof

79%

Continental PremiumContact 6

96%

GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

79%

Conforto e ruído

75%

Nokian

Powerproof

64%

Bridgestone

Potenza S001

67%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

68%

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Ruído externo

Nokian Powerproof

73%

Bridgestone Potenza S001

70%

Continental PremiumContact 6

60%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

75%

Ruído interno

Nokian Powerproof

80%

Bridgestone Potenza S001

58%

Continental PremiumContact 6

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

64%

GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

69%

Conforto ao rodar

Nokian Powerproof

71%

Continental PremiumContact 6

71%

GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

71%

Economia

75%

Nokian

Powerproof

80%

Bridgestone

Potenza S001

88%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

76%

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

89%

GoodYear

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Resistência ao rolamento

Nokian Powerproof

79%

Continental PremiumContact 6

88%

GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

88%

Eficiência de combustível

Nokian Powerproof

84%

Bridgestone Potenza S001

82%

Continental PremiumContact 6

82%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

84%

GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

87%

Quilometragem

Nokian Powerproof

62%

Bridgestone Potenza S001

78%

Continental PremiumContact 6

95%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

91%

Testes usados na comparação

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
Autobild	Verão	2020	245/45 R18	Ver
ADAC	Verão	2020	225/40 R18	Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Comparação: Nokian Powerproof vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Powerproof

Potenza S001

PremiumContact 6

Ecsta PS71

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Test profile

Comparação de desempenho

Testes usados na comparação

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação