4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Lassa Competus Winter 2+ vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Lassa
Competus Winter 2+
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
1
4
18
4
6
3
1
Melhor posição
#4
#3
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
Posição média
4.0
12.0
6.1
3.3
4.7
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
16
111
47
40
146
36
66

Molhado

Molhado
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Frenagem úmida
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Neve

Neve
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%

Seco

Seco
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Conforto

Conforto
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Conforto
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Ruído exterior
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Custos

Custos
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação