Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Dunlop Winter

Médio-alto

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

WinterCraft WP52+

G-FORCE WINTER 2

KRISALP HP3

Winter

Número de testes

3

23

28

2

Best position

#4

#1

#2

#1

Average position

4.3

6.7

8.0

1.5

Teste mais recente

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

97

107

115

65

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado

79%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Kleber

KRISALP HP3

Frenagem úmida

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

59%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

59%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

59%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

67%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Curva em círculo molhado

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

55%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

63%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Aquaplanagem longitudinal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

90%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Aquaplanagem transversal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

73%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

82%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Desempenho em piso seco

73%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

57%

Kleber

KRISALP HP3

Travagem a seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

57%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Manuseamento a seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

64%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

64%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

56%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Desempenho na neve

83%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

96%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

94%

Kleber

KRISALP HP3

Travagem de neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

96%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Tracção na neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

96%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Manipulação da neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

96%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

88%

Dunlop Winter

79%

Dunlop Winter

79%

Curvas em círculo na neve

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

96%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Conforto e ruído

74%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

60%

Kleber

KRISALP HP3

Ruído externo

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

60%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Conforto ao rodar

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

60%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Economia

71%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

67%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

62%

Kleber

KRISALP HP3

Resistência ao rolamento

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

73%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

73%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Quilometragem

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

60%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

51%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Testes usados na comparação

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
Autobild	Inverno	2025	225/40 R18	Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Dunlop Winter

WinterCraft WP52+

G-FORCE WINTER 2

KRISALP HP3

Winter

Winter

Test profile

Comparação de desempenho

Testes usados na comparação

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação