4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Barum Polaris 6

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dunlop
Winter
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Barum
Polaris 6
Número de testes
3
23
2
14
3
Best position
#4
#1
#1
#1
#2
Average position
4.3
6.7
1.5
3.6
7.0
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
97
107
65
188
98

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Barum Polaris 6
61%
Barum
Polaris 6
Frenagem úmida
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Barum Polaris 6
67%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Barum Polaris 6
67%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
55%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Barum Polaris 6
55%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Barum Polaris 6
61%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Barum Polaris 6
56%
Desempenho em piso seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
86%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Barum Polaris 6
73%
Barum
Polaris 6
Travagem a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Barum Polaris 6
73%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
91%
Barum Polaris 6
73%
Desempenho na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
83%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Barum Polaris 6
73%
Barum
Polaris 6
Travagem de neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Barum Polaris 6
78%
Tracção na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Barum Polaris 6
78%
Manipulação da neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
96%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Dunlop Winter
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Barum Polaris 6
71%
Curvas em círculo na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Barum Polaris 6
63%
Conforto e ruído
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
74%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Barum Polaris 6
87%
Barum
Polaris 6
Ruído externo
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Barum Polaris 6
87%
Conforto ao rodar
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Barum Polaris 6
87%
Economia
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
89%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Barum Polaris 6
83%
Barum
Polaris 6
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Barum Polaris 6
96%
Quilometragem
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
60%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
96%
Barum Polaris 6
69%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2025225/40 R18Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação