4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Médio-alto
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Médio-alto
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

8.1
R14 – R20
Continental WinterContact TS 870 PPrémio
ContinentalContinental

WinterContact TS 870 P

9.3
R16 – R22
1 mutual test(s) with detailed data
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Número de testes
3
23
29
Best position
#4
#1
#1
Average position
4.3
6.7
3.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
97
107
178

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Frenagem úmida
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
67%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
55%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Desempenho em piso seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Travagem a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Desempenho na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
83%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Travagem de neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Tracção na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Manipulação da neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
96%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Curvas em círculo na neve
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Conforto e ruído
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
74%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Ruído externo
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Conforto ao rodar
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Economia
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Quilometragem
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
69%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2025225/40 R18Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação