4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Perfil do teste

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
10
16
4
6
3
4
Melhor posição
#2
#3
#3
#3
#2
#2
Posição média
6.0
5.5
12.0
4.7
3.7
3.3
Teste mais recente
2026
2023
2025
2026
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
109
153
111
146
36
40

Molhado

Molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Conforto

Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Seco

Seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Custos

Custos
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação