4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
10
18
4
4
6
3
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#3
#2
#3
#2
Posição média
6.0
6.1
12.0
3.3
4.7
3.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
109
47
111
40
146
36

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Frenagem úmida
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Custos
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store