4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Perfil do teste

Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Número de testes
1
16
10
4
18
6
Melhor posição
#1
#3
#2
#3
#1
#3
Posição média
1.0
5.5
6.0
12.0
6.1
4.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2023
2026
2025
2024
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
27
153
109
111
47
146

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Frenagem úmida
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Neve
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Conforto
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Ruído exterior
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Conforto
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Seco
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Travagem a seco
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Manuseamento a seco
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Custos
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store