4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
4
18
6
3
24
1
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
Posição média
3.3
6.1
4.7
3.7
2.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
47
146
36
150
66

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store