4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Número de testes
16
10
14
4
5
Melhor posição
#3
#2
#8
#2
#1
Posição média
5.5
6.0
13.4
3.3
2.8
Teste mais recente
2023
2026
2026
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
109
153
40
139

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Comportamento em condução seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store