4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Número de testes
16
4
3
1
3
Melhor posição
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Posição média
5.5
3.3
3.7
1.0
1.3
Teste mais recente
2023
2026
2025
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
40
36
66
23

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store