4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Perfil do teste

Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Número de testes
21
4
18
5
28
Melhor posição
#2
#3
#1
#1
#1
Posição média
11.9
12.0
6.1
2.8
2.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2024
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
165
111
47
139
68

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Guia lateral húmida
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Seco
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Resposta da direcção seca
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Ruído interior
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Custos
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store