4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Perfil do teste

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Número de testes
21
18
4
5
28
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#3
#1
#1
Posição média
11.9
6.1
12.0
2.8
2.3
Teste mais recente
2024
2024
2025
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
165
47
111
139
68

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Guia lateral húmida
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Seco
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Resposta da direcção seca
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Ruído interior
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Custos
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store