4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Perfil do teste

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Número de testes
21
18
4
3
24
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Posição média
11.9
6.1
3.3
3.7
2.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2024
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
165
47
40
36
151

Molhado

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Guia lateral húmida
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%

Seco

Seco
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Resposta da direcção seca
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%

Conforto

Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Ruído interior
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%

Custos

Custos
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação