4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Perfil do teste

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Número de testes
6
17
4
24
Melhor posição
#3
#1
#2
#1
Posição média
4.7
1.7
3.3
2.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
146
80
40
302

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Frenagem úmida
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Curva em círculo molhado
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Desempenho em piso molhado
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Seco
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Travagem a seco
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Manuseamento a seco
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Mudança de faixa seca
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Desempenho em piso seco
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Conforto
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Ruído exterior
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Custos
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Resistência ao rolamento
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Preço/valor
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Quilometragem
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store