4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Dunlop
Winter
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Número de testes
13
3
2
29
Best position
#7
#4
#1
#1
Average position
11.9
4.3
1.5
3.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
78
97
65
178

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
66%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Frenagem úmida
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
67%
Curva em círculo molhado
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Desempenho em piso seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
81%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Travagem a seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Manuseamento a seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
64%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Desempenho na neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
53%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
83%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Travagem de neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
51%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Tracção na neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
51%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Manipulação da neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
46%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
96%
Dunlop Winter
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Curvas em círculo na neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Conforto e ruído
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
74%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
74%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Ruído externo
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Conforto ao rodar
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Economia
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
56%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Resistência ao rolamento
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
42%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Quilometragem
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
69%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2025225/40 R18Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação