Comparação: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Médio-alto

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak 6

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Número de testes

13

3

14

23

Best position

#7

#4

#1

Average position

11.9

4.3

3.6

6.7

Teste mais recente

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

78

97

188

107

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado

66%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

79%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

74%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Frenagem úmida

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

59%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

67%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

59%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

67%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

59%

Curva em círculo molhado

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

71%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

55%

Aquaplanagem longitudinal

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Aquaplanagem transversal

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

56%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Desempenho em piso seco

81%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

73%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Travagem a seco

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Manuseamento a seco

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

91%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

64%

Desempenho na neve

53%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

83%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

96%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Travagem de neve

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

51%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Tracção na neve

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

51%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Manipulação da neve

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

46%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Curvas em círculo na neve

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

63%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Conforto e ruído

74%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

74%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Ruído externo

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Conforto ao rodar

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Economia

56%

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

71%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

89%

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

67%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Resistência ao rolamento

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

42%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Quilometragem

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

96%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

60%

Testes usados na comparação

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
Autobild	Inverno	2025	225/40 R18	Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Comparação: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak 6

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Test profile

Comparação de desempenho

Testes usados na comparação

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação