4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Número de testes
13
23
29
Best position
#7
#1
#1
Average position
11.9
6.7
3.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
78
107
178

Comparação de desempenho

Média de 2 testes

Desempenho em molhado
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Frenagem úmida
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
63%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Curva em círculo molhado
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
57%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Desempenho em piso seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
81%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Travagem a seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
85%
Manuseamento a seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Desempenho na neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
52%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
94%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Travagem de neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
54%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Tracção na neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
54%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Manipulação da neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
46%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Curvas em círculo na neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
53%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
85%
Conforto e ruído
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Ruído externo
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Conforto ao rodar
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Economia
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
48%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Resistência ao rolamento
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
42%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Quilometragem
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
54%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2025225/40 R18Ver
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2023225/45 R18Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação