4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Barum Polaris 6 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Barum
Polaris 6
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Número de testes
13
23
3
29
Best position
#7
#1
#2
#1
Average position
11.9
6.7
7.0
3.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
78
107
98
178

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
66%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Barum Polaris 6
61%
Barum
Polaris 6
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Frenagem úmida
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Barum Polaris 6
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Barum Polaris 6
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
67%
Curva em círculo molhado
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
55%
Barum Polaris 6
55%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Barum Polaris 6
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Barum Polaris 6
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Desempenho em piso seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
81%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Barum Polaris 6
73%
Barum
Polaris 6
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Travagem a seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Barum Polaris 6
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Manuseamento a seco
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Barum Polaris 6
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Desempenho na neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
53%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Barum Polaris 6
73%
Barum
Polaris 6
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Travagem de neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
51%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Barum Polaris 6
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Tracção na neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
51%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Barum Polaris 6
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Manipulação da neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
46%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Barum Polaris 6
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Curvas em círculo na neve
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Barum Polaris 6
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Conforto e ruído
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
74%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Barum Polaris 6
87%
Barum
Polaris 6
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Ruído externo
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Barum Polaris 6
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Conforto ao rodar
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Barum Polaris 6
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Economia
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
56%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Barum Polaris 6
83%
Barum
Polaris 6
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Resistência ao rolamento
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
42%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Barum Polaris 6
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Quilometragem
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
60%
Barum Polaris 6
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
69%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2025225/40 R18Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação