4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Dunlop Winter

Continental WinterContact TS 870 PPrémio
ContinentalContinental

WinterContact TS 870 P

9.3
R16 – R22
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5Prémio
MichelinMichelin

PILOT ALPIN 5

10.0
R16 – R22
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Médio-alto
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
Dunlop WinterPrémio
DunlopDunlop

Winter

9.3
R15 – R21
1 mutual test(s) with detailed data
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Dunlop
Winter
Número de testes
29
21
3
2
Best position
#1
#1
#4
#1
Average position
3.7
1.7
4.3
1.5
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
178
133
97
65

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
83%
Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Frenagem úmida
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
67%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Curva em círculo molhado
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
96%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Desempenho em piso seco
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
90%
Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Travagem a seco
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Manuseamento a seco
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
64%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Desempenho na neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
83%
Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
83%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Travagem de neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Tracção na neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Manipulação da neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
96%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
96%
Dunlop Winter
79%
Curvas em círculo na neve
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Conforto e ruído
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
83%
Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
74%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Ruído externo
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Conforto ao rodar
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Economia
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
76%
Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Resistência ao rolamento
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
73%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Quilometragem
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
69%
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2025225/40 R18Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação