4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Ceat WinterDrive SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Ceat
WinterDrive SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
1
18
1
4
3
Melhor posição
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
Posição média
3.0
6.1
1.0
3.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
10
47
66
40
36

Molhado

Molhado
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Frenagem úmida
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Curva em círculo molhado
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Neve

Neve
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
95%

Seco

Seco
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Conforto

Conforto
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Custos

Custos
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação