4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: Ceat WinterDrive SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Perfil do teste

Ceat
WinterDrive SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Número de testes
1
18
4
1
3
5
Melhor posição
#3
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Posição média
3.0
6.1
3.3
1.0
3.7
2.2
Teste mais recente
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
10
47
40
66
36
63

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Frenagem úmida
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Curva em círculo molhado
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Neve
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
95%
Seco
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Travagem a seco
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Manuseamento a seco
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Conforto
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Conforto
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Ruído exterior
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Custos
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store