4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Uniroyal WinterExpert vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Uniroyal
WinterExpert
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
49
12
17
Best position
#1
#5
#1
Average position
3.2
11.3
1.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
213
93
80

Neve

Neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tracção na neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Travagem de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Manipulação da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Encanto da neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Orientação lateral sobre a neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
100%
Aceleração de neve
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
94%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
97%

Seco

Seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Travagem a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
42%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Manuseamento a seco
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Mudança de faixa seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Resposta da direcção seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Comportamento em condução seca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%

Molhado

Molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
58%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Frenagem úmida
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
53%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Curva em círculo molhado
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Conforto

Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Ruído exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Conforto
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
80%
Ruído interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Custos

Custos
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Quilometragem
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
39%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Preço/valor
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%

Gelo

Gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
32%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Travagem brusca
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Uniroyal WinterExpert
32%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Mutual tests available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Testes mútuos

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
ADACADAC
Inverno
2022215/60 R16Ver

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação