4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3

Test profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
Número de testes
23
3
28
Best position
#1
#4
#2
Average position
6.7
4.3
8.0
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
107
97
115

Seco

Seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Travagem a seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
63%
Manuseamento a seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Desempenho em piso seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
Comportamento em condução seca
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
76%

Molhado

Molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
70%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
69%
Frenagem úmida
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
65%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
71%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
Curva em círculo molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
72%
Desempenho em molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
76%

Neve

Neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
Tracção na neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
81%
Travagem de neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
86%
Manipulação da neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
Encanto da neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
85%
Desempenho na neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
86%

Conforto

Conforto
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
78%
Ruído exterior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
79%
Conforto
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
83%
Ruído interior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%

Custos

Custos
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
70%
Resistência ao rolamento
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
71%
Quilometragem
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
56%
Preço/valor
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
77%
Eficiência de combustível
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%

Gelo

Gelo
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
78%
Travagem brusca
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Orientação lateral do gelo
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Mutual tests available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Testes mútuos

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2025225/40 R18Ver
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2025225/40 R18Ver

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação